Serves the Commercial Small Fleet Market of 10 – 50 Vehicles

U.S. DOT’s Highway Safety Package "Lacking": Advocacy Group

May 14, 2003

Advocates for Highway and Auto Safety (Advocates) criticized the United States Department of Transportation’s (U.S. DOT) new proposal for reauthorization of the multi-year, multi-billion dollar highway bill, named the Safe, Accountable, Flexible and Efficient Transportation Equity Act of 2003, or “SAFETEA.” “A few short weeks ago, U.S. DOT released its 2002 motor vehicle fatality figures and they showed that the number of people killed in traffic crashes increased to the highest level since 1990, an astounding 42,850 persons. Drunk driving deaths are up, as are teen driving, motorcycle and rollover deaths. This is a public health epidemic and the Administration has given us surgical masks with gaping holes,” said Judith Lee Stone, president of Advocates. Advocates spearheads a SAFETEA coalition formed in 1997 that supports increased funding for highway safety programs, standard enforcement seat belt laws, enhanced enforcement of drunk driving laws, no rollbacks on truck safety, and improved intersection safety. The SAFETEA Coalition is comprised of 110 federal, state and local businesses and groups throughout the nation. (See Advocates’ website: www.saferoads.org for the list.) “DOT claims there are substantially more funds for highway safety programs, but, as always, the devil is in the details. The DOT legislative proposal repackages existing, old programs and adds `safety’ to the name,” stated Stone. Also according to the latest U.S. DOT data, most people killed in crashes are unrestrained (19,103). Only 18 states and the District of Columbia have standard, or primary, enforcement belt laws that allow police officers to cite someone for not wearing a belt without having committed an additional offense. These laws have been proven to increase belt use by 10-15 percent. “The U.S. DOT proposal will not guarantee that all states pass standard enforcement seat belt laws,” said Stone. “The proposal creates a new incentive grant program to increase belt use and a weak disincentive for states that don’t. However, it has loopholes and escape hatches that will do more for creative accounting than for safety.” “The Administration proposal is not even a baby step toward closing the Grand Canyon gap that exists between the annual $230 billion cost of motor vehicle crashes and the Administration’s meager investment in auto and highway safety. This shell game of shifting funds from one program to another is deceptive. We call for the games to end. Let’s employ proven, effective solutions to protect motorists, and let’s once and for all devote the resources needed to do so.” concluded Stone.
Twitter Facebook Google+

Comments

Please note that comments may be moderated. 
Leave this field empty:
 
 

Fleet Incentives

Determine the actual cost of owning and running a vehicle in your fleet. Compare vehicles by class and model.

FleetFAQ

Fleet Tracking And Telematics

Todd Ewing from Fleetmatics will answer your questions and challenges

View All

 

Fleet Management And Leasing

Merchants Experts will answer your questions and challenges

View All

 

Sponsored by

Terminology used in some European countries to identify fleet services provided on a fee basis, for example, the management of maintenance and authorizations for repairs and tires. Other services might include the buying of new vehicles for the customer’s account and the selling of used ones on the customer’s behalf.

Read more

Up Next

More From The World's Largest Fleet Publisher