If a company provides an employee a $500 monthly car allowance, the employee will have approximately $200 in tax liabilities for federal and state income tax, based on a 40-percent combined tax bracket. If the employee needs to spend $200 on taxes, in reality he or she will have only $300 to spend for the car, not $500. 2. Two-Percent Adjusted Gross Income Threshold.
Theoretically, employees can deduct all business-related expenses and business mileage on their federal and state personal income tax returns and get the $200 back. However, this is not always the case. On an individual tax return, an employee must itemize deductions; not everyone does. If deductions are not itemized, then a driver is not eligible for any of the business-related tax deductions for the use of his or her personal vehicle. If a driver does itemize deductions, then a 2 percent of adjusted gross income floor has to be met before expenses for the business-related use of a personal vehicle can be deducted. “For example, if an employee is making $100,000, the first $2,000 is not deductible. The adjusted gross income floor restricts an employee’s ability to obtain a tax benefit on business-related vehicle expenses,” said Jim Fredlund, director of tax management for GE Commercial Finance Fleet Services. “This rule only applies to individuals, not companies. In addition, if a driver is married and files a joint income tax with a combined annual income exceeding $145,950, then there is a phase-out of up to 80 percent of the allowable itemized deductions beyond the 2 percent threshold.” 3. Social Security (FICA) Taxes.
Using the example of a $500 per month car allowance, this money is subject to FICA taxes, which are shared by the employer and employee. FICA taxes cannot be reduced by itemized deductions for the business use of a personal vehicle. 4. Interest Payments are Not Tax Deductible.
If the employee finances a personal vehicle, the interest expense is not tax deductible. The IRS ruled years ago that personal interest payments are not deductible by individuals even if used to finance a personal vehicle required for their jobs. However, if a business finances a company vehicle, the interest expense is deductible. 5. Increased Risk of IRS Audit.
The audit burden falls on the reimbursed employee for substantiation of all business expenses. Employees may not realize that mileage expenses and other reimbursed costs for business use of a personal vehicle are subject to audit by the IRS, and drivers are notorious for not keeping good records. Exaggerated Business Mileage
Employees may feel that their company is not adequately reimbursing their personal vehicle use for business purposes. “When this occurs, employees will attempt to maximize their reimbursement for mileage and vehicle expenses. One common way is to exaggerate business mileage,” said Fredlund. “We have access to numerous studies with our lessees that show when you go from a reimbursement program to a company-provided car program, the reported business mileage goes down by 30 percent. It is not that employees drive less, it is that the business miles no longer generate reimbursement monies, so employees are reporting the actual miles. This tells me that when a company switches to a driver reimbursement program it can expect a 30-percent exaggeration of business miles driven,” said Fredlund. Increased Employee Turnover
In addition, employee turnover increases when a company eliminates a company-provided vehicle program. “We have found that when companies go to driver reimbursement from a company-provided vehicle, there is about a 10-percent loss in work-force because employees do not like the new reimbursement program,” said Fredlund. With all of these negative tax implications, how can a company justify a driver reimbursement program to its employees? Let me know what you think. email@example.com
Originally posted on Automotive Fleet